D&D: GM Advice

Being a Dungeon Master in any tabletop role playing game is a unique position with responsibilities and duties that players do not have. It can be daunting for people new to the systems or the concept and a reminder of what a Dungeon Master should focus on can always be helpful. These are in essence the job of the Dungone Master.

  • Foster the relationship between the players, the game, and keep the play session moving.
  • Arbiter of the rules
  • Set the stage for the adventure, but not dictate it.

Fostering the relationship

Dungeon Master’s are the glue that keeps the game running by engaging the players in some form of adventure. They are checking if the players look to be engaged with what is happening, enabling hero(or villain depending on the nature of your game) moments where each player has a spotlight based on their actions or decisions. A competent Dungeon Master constantly evaluates if members of the table are lost and bored while the other are having a drinking contest or shopping trip. React to your players and embrace the content that they seem to enjoy, challenge them to expand their interests, but let them point the compass.

You will find recommendation after recommendation that a session zero should be done to establish ground rules, the tone of the game, and the focus of the players. I do not want to undervalue this tactic, but for a new Dungeon Master, you simply don’t have the experience and knowledge to know how to run a session zero. Instead, the best recommendation that can be made is to develop the skills to be self-critical on the game. After every session, take notes on what felt like it went well and what did not to evaluate and research why this might have been.

Are half the party bored unless there is combat, loot, and rewards or are players begging for role-playing moments that do not occur because you are not engaging with their requests? Are they asking for a reason to care about the plotline you are pushing?

Did you nearly kill the party in a fight you did not expect to be so difficult? Do a post mortem on whether it was just a result of bad tactics/luck(dice rolls) or did abilities get used incorrectly resulting in a harder conflict then intended.

The point of this self-evaluation is not to be self-destructive but learn from any mistakes (intended or unintended) to improve for the next session or campaign. React and shift your priorities when presenting the content.

Rule Arbiter

Dungeon Masters are the final word at the table about how to apply rules, but they must strive to apply them consistently and fairly. Whether you adhere strictly to a system rule book (D&D 3E, 4E, 5E, Pathfinder, or any other system) or you have custom rules you implement the rules need to be the same between each session.

The Critical Role Dungeon Master Matthew Mercer has a great saying “You can certainly try” in response to player questions and requested actions. The point of the Dungeon Master is not to tell the player how to play or what to do, but explain how they can attempt to do each action. If the player wants to do something most would consider impossible, you determine what they need to roll to see if they succeed or not. The harder the task the higher they need to roll, but this keeps the player from blaming the Dungeon Master from blocking their actions and role-playing and the failure rests on the player instead of due to the Dungeon Master saying “No!”.

There will be times where you realize that the rules are providing unfair advantages or unbalanced situations in the game. Evaluating these situations and deciding if there should be changes to the rules can occur, but are best done outside of play sessions with clear communication between the players and the Dungeon Master. It could either be a discussion or the Dungeon Master explaining the rule change and communicating this is how it will work going forward consistently for future game sessions.

Depending on your game there can be benefits to “fudging” dice rolls as a Dungeon Master from behind the traditional Dungeon Master Screen. This can be in the form or changing rolls, ignoring rolls, ignoring hit points of creatures, and other changes to the standard rules. The most important aspect of this tactic is to never use these actions against the players. If the players think the Dungeon Master is cheating against the players it just leads to mistrust and a broken party. If these are selectively used, but only done so to the player’s benefit it can help the game run more smoothly. If it is too common the player’s can think they can do no wrong and you might need to re-evaluate the style of game you are playing and what level of risks are involved in player decisions.

Staging the Adventure

You have spent weeks of time planning the perfect adventure, the best plot hooks, and the perfect set pieces for glorious life and death battle between your players and the biggest enemy in the game, but your players are spending all their time away from the action playing pirates! At the end of the day this is not your story to tell, it is the player’s.

Whether your adventure is homebrew or straight from a published adventure you must understand that your job as a Dungeon Master is to set the stage and let the players decide what happens. You cannot force their hand and direct where the party is supposed to go on the predetermined path. The party might simply be inclined after playing their characters that instead of being the noble heroes that they might instead be the villainous bad guys.

The Dungeon Master should solicit the feedback of the players and collect their back story information, but after that, it is the Dungeon Master’s job to set the stage for the players to make decisions. These can be informed or uninformed decisions based on the situations, but the consequences of actions must always come from the decisions the players make. You might have presented 3 side quests for the player to interact with, but they simply don’t care and want to rush to find something related to their backstory or the main focus of the campaign.

All change in the plot, environment, politics, or rewards and risks should all flow from the decisions of the players. Keep in mind that choosing not to act is still a decision by the players, so if the players decide to rest their next battle might be harder because the enemies had time to heal or go get reinforcements. The Dungeon Master has to juggle the consequences of direct decisions, the unknown ramifications of time in the game, and non-player character perceptions of what has happened. The more you can ground these impacts in the various personalities of the factions, environments, and characters the more you will have a living and breathing world that your players want to inhabit.

If you are using a campaign book or even if you created everything from scratch you need to know options of where the party might go to prepare in advance. You don’t need everything detailed out, but at least a vague concept of where the party might head.

Additionally, the valuable skills of improvisation are key to having a world that the players are impacting. If they take actions that you are not expecting you should address the immediate impacts at the moment, but it might be practical to take a short break or end a session on the cliffhanger to enable you to chart out new branches of the story that you had not considered.

Let the players chart the course and you merely update them on the impacts of their route through the world. Their reputation can grow or shrink depending on if they ran towards the fight or away to save their own skins. The impacts on the world can be averted, subverted, or avoided entirely depending on how they tackle the problems.

There can even be a real possibility that you need to turn the campaign into something entirely different from what you planned or was in your purchased adventure because they are interested in other things. Salvage what you can, inform them of their choices, and you can even punish the characters in the game, but never punish the players for being honest about what they enjoy about the game.

Captain Marvel

Captain Marvel is an enjoyable movie, but not one that stands on its own. In effect, it serves as an origin movie for both the character Captain Marvel (Carol Danvers) and Nick Fury.

Starting on the Kree planet Hala, Vers is struggling with dreams and memories that don’t match her current world view. Struggling against authority, training, and the AI leader of the Kree, the Supreme Intelligence, leads to a mission against the Skrull, alien shapeshifters. The mission starts to unravel her understanding of the universe, her place in it, and her history as she eventually lands on Earth in the 1990s.

Crash landing in a strip mall in the Blockbuster store and given directions to a Radio Shack (all defunct brands) she reaches out to her Kree team as Nick Fury and SHIELD enters the fray and the connections to earth and the mystery deepens. Captain Marvel comes into her own, regains her memories, and understands her past and establishes a place in the universe as an unmitigated badass.

The acting was great with the highlights being Samuel Jackson, Annette Bening, and Ben Mendelsohn. Brie Larson acted well, but honestly, the writing did not give her enough of a character arc to really stretch, fall low, and rise above.

The issues with the movie are structural. This movie fits as a prequel filling in the gaps of the 20+ movie cinematic universe that marvel has established. Scenes with Clark Gregg as Agent Coulson and his interactions with Nick Fury are great if you already know about the characters, but without that knowledge they don’t have any kind of impact. You care about how Nick Fury loses his eye because it has been such a mystery for decades outside of this movie.

Vers, the protagonist starts the movie implied to still be in training after 6 years and is apparently getting her first mission which happens to lead to whole scenario. This movie could have benefited from a short montage of her working with the Kree team on various mission and then finally the plot critical mission that targeted her comes up. Possibly this is an misunderstanding on my part, but if so it was so weakly implied it reinforces my complaint.

The movie also suffered from self imposed drama with the release on international women’s day and the internet imposed drama of women empowerment and reaction against this as seen on Rotten Tomatoes. The movie itself was not overtly sending a message and with a character backstory of a female pilot fighting to fly and to do combat missions the personality and reactions felt honest without being preachy. The music on the other hand just felt out of place because it leaned too hard into the 90’s vibe and didn’t fit well. Playing “Just a girl” by No Doubt during a key fight scene felt jarring.

For comparison sake, I watched Wonder Woman again and thought it was just a better female empowerment movie that stands on its own. You do not need to know about Justice League or Batman vs Superman to learn everything you need in Wonder Woman. The movie stands on its own and it establishes through excellent use of music a Wonder Woman lyrical theme and fight accompaniment.

Using dated 90’s music misses the opportunity used by Marvel so many times in the past to establish identifiable character themes and use them again in the future when that character has their moment in the ensemble movies of the future, Avengers: Endgame.

In closing, I am glad to have seen Captain Marvel filling in the missing pieces and prepare for Avengers: Endgame, but I recognize some of the deficiencies in the quality and expectations set up by Marvel the company. Simply put it was a good movie, but it wasn’ Black Panther the Marvel movie that took this spot in the schedule last year.